Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the ACTIVAN WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |