• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Maxxis Victra Sport 5 vs. Falken Azenis FK510

# Maxxis Victra Sport 5
/69%
Falken Azenis FK510
/71%

Add to comparison

Maxxis
Falken
DimensionsR17 - R21 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

The following text provides a comparison between the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 and the Falken Azenis FK510, two tyres highly known within the vehicle industry.


Starting with the Maxxis Victra Sport 5, this UHP summer tyre is manufactured in China and has an aggregated rating of 75%. It particularly stands out due to its interior noise reduction feature, as tested in the Autobild test group. Furthermore, in the AutoMotorSport testing, it has taken a notable 5th place among 11 tyres due to its excellent wet handling and wet side guide. ADAC's test result also praised its cross aquaplaning, mileage, noise, and wet circle cornering performance. Despite the slight delay on dry circuits, and weakness in precision steering on dry curves, the ALL-NEW Maxxis Tyre holds a solid position in the market.


Moving on to the Falken Azenis FK510, this Japanese and Turkish made summer tyre by Falken has an aggregated rating of 74%. It has numerous commendable features such as aquaplaning - cross, comfort, wet braking and handling, exterior noise, price/value, and rolling resistance — as per tests conducted by Autobild. Furthermore, at the AutoMotorSport testing, it landed on the 8th position, while in the ADAC test, it secured the 8th position— being praised for its impressive mileage. However, the tyre has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520 and the FK510 has been noted to have weak levels of grip and extended braking distances in wet conditions, alongside a tendency to oversteer.


Summing up the comparison, both tyres have their unique strengths and weaknesses, with the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 standing out for its wet handling performance and the Falken Azenis FK510 for its comfort and value for money. As per mutual test positions, it can be concluded that both tyres have performed competitively in the respective tests. However, in terms of overall quality, the balance seems to lean slightly towards the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 due to its superior wet handling attributes.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDry
Best values in testpříkladné2+1-
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré2-2
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-2-
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name RatingWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in testvynikající9,09,79,4
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé7,07,67,6
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
dobré7,57,06,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name Points totalRatingWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,1velmi dobré5,75,76,3
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Rating: Good
7,9dobré8,27,77,7
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Very good
8,1velmi dobré 9,27,57,3
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test929393
Maxxis Victra Sport 5837591
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Highly recommended
86velmi doporučeno8983
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name RatingWetDryRolling resistanceNoiseComfort
Best values in testvelmi dobré9,49,3101010
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré7,88,5688
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
dobré6,77,6777
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné11-1
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno22+3-
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 221-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
Maxxis Victra Sport 534,833,4
Falken Azenis FK5103630,7
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingWetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdobré1,71,32,82,01,6
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré 2,22,02,8 2,0 2,4
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2,42,93,02,0 2,0
Show test details