Comparison: Linglong Sport Master vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Table of contents:
| # | Linglong Sport Master
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R18 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Linglong Sport Master and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 are both summer tyres with differing evaluations based on our tyre tests. Let's examine the distinct characteristics of each model in detail.
Scoring at 64%, Linglong Sport Master outperforms in a few aspects, notably 'Exterior noise', according to Autobild's testing. It was positioned 7th out of 50 tyres in the test, demonstrating a decent overall ranking. According to Autobild 2023 test, the Linglong Sport Master shows strengths in short wet and dry braking distances, quiet rolling noise, and an affordable price. However, drawbacks of this tyre include a very low kilometer performance, strong understeering dry handling, and average comfort.
On the other side, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has a rating of 42%. It is considered as a high performer in terms of 'Dry braking' as per Autobild's test, placing the model 4th out of 50. The test summary from Autobild 2023 emphasized the sports dynamic dry handling and short wet and dry braking distances as the Yokohama Advan Sport V107's strengths. However, it falls short in terms of mileage, pricing - it's on the higher side, and its high rolling resistance leading to devaluation.
In terms of head-to-head performance, the Linglong Sport Master seems to take the lead with a significantly higher rating of 64%, compared to Yokohama Advan Sport V107's 42%.
However, both tyres are reputed for their performance and serve their dedicated target audience. Linglong, the manufacturer of Linglong Sport Master, does not have a newer tyre model that replaces this one. The same applies for Yokohama, the manufacturer of Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
In conclusion, the Linglong Sport Master mainly suits those seeking lower external noise and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is a match for those looking for superior dry braking abilities and dynamic handling, despite its greater price tag.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | 33.8 | 31.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | 58.9 | 25.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
