Segment
1. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost2. Goodride Sport SA-37 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Goodride Sport SA-37
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Generally, Goodride summer tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Linglong (44%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max and Goodride Sport SA-37, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Goodride Sport SA-37 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Sport SA-37 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Goodride Sport SA-37
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 174 | 73 | 101 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 37,7 | 33,3 | |||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 36,3 | 33,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
