Segment
1. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost2. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Apollo Aspire XP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Linglong summer tyres are slightly better rated (44%) than Apollo (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max and Apollo Aspire XP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Apollo Aspire XP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Aspire XP were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Apollo Aspire XP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Aspire XP 8.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 211 | 101 | 110 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 37,7 | 33,3 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
