Segment
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Linglong (44%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max HP010 and Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max HP010
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Linglong Green-Max HP010 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
