Segment
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn I Fit LW31 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Laufenn (61%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 73% compared to 51% of the Laufenn I Fit LW31. The first tyre test of Laufenn I Fit LW31 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the I Fit LW31 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested.
| # | Laufenn I Fit LW31
| Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Laufenn I Fit LW31 | 39,4 | - | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 32,2 | 24 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
