Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Vredestein (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Vredestein Quatrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Quatrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kumho Solus HA31
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
Show test details |