Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Continental (70%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the AllSeasonContact were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kumho Solus HA31
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||
Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,6 | 49,9 | |||||
Show test details |