Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the SNOW MAX 2 were tested.
| # | Kumho PorTran CW51
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | ||||||||