• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran CW51 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.

# Kumho PorTran CW51
/0%
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
/0%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Michelin
DimensionsR14 - R17 R15 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name RatingWetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdoporučeno2,42,32,22,32,52,01,6
Kumho PorTran CW51
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno3,64,13,02,63,03,02,0
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Rating: Recommended
doporučeno 2,93,42,52,43,22,0 2,0
Show test details