Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran CW51 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.
# | Kumho PorTran CW51
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |