Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van also have C wet ratings.
# | Kumho PorTran CW51
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Show test details |