Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will examine two tyres - the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. This comparison will provide insights into test results, strengths, and weaknesses of both tyres, ultimately determining the more superior tyre overall.
Starting with the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S tyre, this model has a rating of 73% on our site, and is manufactured in China. Its strengths include low exterior noise, effective snow braking, high mileage and strong price to value ratio. However, according to multiple test results from "Autobild", its weaknesses include slightly longer wet and dry braking distances, mediocre aquaplaning reserves, and a high rolling resistance. Of the total tyres tested, it held 10th position, indicating a respectable but not top-tier performance.
Moving on to the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, a successor to the Hankook Kinergy 4S. Manufactured in Korea, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a high rating of 84% on our site. In the same tests, undertaken by "Autobild", Kinergy 4S2 H750 shone in areas like aquaplaning (both cross and longitudinal), exterior noise, snow braking, dry handling, wet braking, and wet handling, attaining 3rd position among all tyres tested. A consistent performer, the only notable drawbacks were slightly elongated dry and wet braking distances and average mileage and economy.
To summarize, while both the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 have their own strengths and weaknesses, the test results favour the latter. With its impressive performance across elements such as handling and braking in different conditions, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 stands out as the more reliable all-rounder tyre.
A point to note, though, is the superior performance of the Kumho Solus 4S when it comes to noise levels and price-value balance. Therefore, depending on your specific expectations and driving conditions, both tyres could potentially cater to your needs effectively. As always, we recommend considering all factors before choosing the right tyre for your vehicle.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 40,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
