Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to all-round tyres, two models that often come up in discussions are the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Falken EuroALL Season AS210. Both offer competitive features, but how do they compare against each other? This article will delve into the strengths, weaknesses, and test results of both tyre models to provide a comprehensive comparison.
The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S is a solid performer in all weather conditions. This tyre, produced in China, scored a 73% rating in our own assessments. In the Autobild test, it ranked 10th out of 32 tyres tested, a commendable position. It displayed superior performance in snow braking, mileage, value, aquaplaning performance, and exterior noise reduction. However, it slightly underperformed in dry and wet braking conditions, reduced aquaplaning reserves, and had a slightly increased rolling resistance.
On the other hand, the Falken EuroALL Season AS210, manufactured in Turkey and also scoring a 73% rating from us, exhibits excellent dry handling and comfort, along with a good price-to-value ratio. It placed 11th in the same Autobild test - just one position behind the Kumho tyre. Notably, the Falken tyre's strongest points were snow traction, secure aquaplaning characteristics, and high mileage. Nevertheless, the tyre was criticised for its slightly understeering snow and wet handling, increased rolling resistance and prolonged dry braking distances.
In subsequent tests, such as autobild 2021 and 2020, these characteristics were frequently reaffirmed. The Kumho tyre still showed its robust dry handling abilities, even though its snow handling capabilities were only satisfactory and its wet handling tendencies were slightly understeering. Meanwhile, the Falken tyre showcased its all-round competency with harmonious driving behaviour in all weather conditions and short braking distances on snow, although comfort was a bit lacking.
Based on the test data and performance results, both tyres offer strong value in the all-round category, with neither clearly surpassing the other. It's a tightly contested race between the two. Considering their similarities, customer choice may ultimately come down to individual preferences such as budget, brand loyalty, and specific performance requirements.
Both the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 currently do not have replacements, making them the latest options from their respective Kumho and Falken manufacturers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,4 | 51,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2+ | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,2 | 50,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,7 | 51,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
