Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs. Nokian Powerproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian Powerproof has a better rating of 51% compared to 21% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS91 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Powerproof has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea and Powerproof is made in Finland.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended