Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we are comparing two summer tyres - the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. While both are rated highly on our website, with scores of 77% and 81% respectively, they also have some differences worth noting.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a reliable summer tyre with a balanced high-performance potential, good handling qualities, and short wet-dry braking distances. Its perfectly good performance does comes with a downside which is an elevated road noise. The best features of this tyre based on tests include Aquaplaning - cross, and Aquaplaning - longitudinal. In the ACE and ADAC tests, this tyre has secured 7th and 10th places respectively within a pool of 10 and 16 tyres.
On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is from the Hankook Ultra High-Performance (UUHP) line made in Korea. It is equipped as original equipment on Audi and Porsche cars to name a few. It has impressive driving performance, agile handling, and short wet and dry braking distances. However, it does fall short in terms of mileage despite its high performance. This tyre's best features include Dry braking and Wet braking according to Autobild test. In tests it performed better than the Kumho, securing 7th place in ACE and 3rd place in Autobild's 53-tyre comparison. Nonetheless, it was ranked 14th in the ADAC test.
While both tyres have not yet been replaced with new models, these are strong contenders in their respective segments. To summarize, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a good choice for those who value a balanced high-performance with affordability but won't mind some road noise. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 on the other hand, is perfect for drivers who prioritize performance and handling above all and do not mind paying a higher price.
In terms of mutual test positions, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has performed better overall adding to its credibility as an ultra-high-performance tyre. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that the final decision will depend on the specific driving conditions and personal preferences of the driver.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 71 | 54 | 19 | 7 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 67 | 47 | 18 | 3 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 62 | 50 | 17 | 6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 1 | 2 | 3- | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 3- | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
