Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Here, we compare two well-known summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and the Barum Bravuris 5 HM. Produced by reputable manufacturers Kumho and Barum respectively, both tires have their unique strengths and weaknesses.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 presents with a rating of 68%, placing it quite above average in terms of overall rating. The major strengths associated with this tyre from various tests include its solid high-performance potential, superior handling qualities, fair pricing, and notably short braking distances in both wet and dry conditions. Its most highlighted weak point was the slightly elevated noise level during the drive.
In a test conducted by Autobild, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 achieved an impressive 5th position out of 50, solidifying its place among the better performers. In the ADAC tests, it ranked even higher, securing a commendable 3rd position. In particular, it was praised for its excellent performance in «Aquaplaning - cross» and «Aquaplaning - longitudal» situations.
On the other hand, the Barum Bravuris 5 HM, with a lower rating of 39%, lags somewhat behind its counterpart in the performance analysis. In the Autobild test it positioned at 42 of 50, while in the ADAC test it ranked 15th. The performance details of the Barum Bravuris 5 HM in different testing parameters were unfortunately not provided in the data.
In conclusion, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 outshines Barum Bravuris 5 HM in various test parameters as well as its overall performance. This makes it a more commendable choice for summer driving conditions. However, individual preferences and needs may still consider the lower-priced Barum Bravuris 5 HM as a viable option.
Note: Neither the Kumho Ecsta PS71 nor the Barum Bravuris 5 HM have been replaced with newer models as of now.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 69.3 | 29.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
