Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Triangle). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Triangle (32%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV has a better rating of 64% compared to 54% of the Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 SUV and the EffeX SUV TS 601 were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
