Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 has a better rating of 82% compared to 65% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Dynaxer HP4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
