Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (60%). The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the Kinergy eco2 K435 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 has B rating.
| # | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
| Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,4 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
