Segment
1. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Kormoran (14%). The first tyre test of Kormoran Snowpro b2 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran Snowpro b2
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 35,5 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||