Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Kormoran (14%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Snowpro b2 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C rating.
# | Kormoran Snowpro b2
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | - | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
Show test details |