Segment
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kormoran (12%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Uniroyal MS plus 77 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the SNOW and the MS plus 77 were tested.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 39.
Average position in tests
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.212. Kormoran SNOW 32.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
Snow traction
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Kormoran SNOW 88%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Kormoran Snow | 39,1 | ||||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36,1 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
