Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Michelin Alpin 5
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Kormoran (12%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C wet grip rating, whereas 88% of Michelin Alpin 5 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 39.
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.882. Kormoran SNOW 32.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Kormoran SNOW 88%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
