Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Quadraxer 3 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we're comparing two potent all-round tyres - the
Kleber Quadraxer 3, and the
Michelin CrossClimate 2. Both tyres have a significant mark in the industry, produced by two distinguished manufacturers, Kleber and Michelin, respectively.
The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is a successor to the Quadraxer 2, boasting improvements in comfort and snow handling. Produced in Poland, it has scored an impressive 90% in our ratings. It's particularly appreciated for dry braking, comfort, and snow braking in tests. However, its downside includes delayed steering response and subpar wet handling.
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is a continuation from the original CrossClimate tyre, manufactured in Italy and Spain. It tops our ratings at 96%. The CrossClimate 2 has been celebrated for its dry and snow braking, snow handling, snow traction and unsurprisingly, having "very good levels of comfort" and "very low rolling resistance." But it does fall short on wet braking and wet handling.
Comparatively, in the Autobild test, out of 15 tyres, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 secured the 4th position while the Michelin CrossClimate 2 ranked 9th. These positions reveal that both tyres perform well relative to other competitors.
To summarize, Kleber Quadraxer 3 provides better comfort and snow handling but falls short on wet handling. Meanwhile, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 performs exceptionally well in dry braking, snow braking, and snow handling, but comes with average performance in wet conditions. Thus, choosing between these two depends on your priorities - whether you are looking for comfort and snow performance or superior dry braking and snow handling.
Remember to always check your vehicle's specifications and your region's conditions before making your final decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.3 | 48.5 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 40,3 | 49,4 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 39,9 | 49,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||