Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP and Fulda SportControl 2 are both summer tyres that have proven to be popular choices among car enthusiasts. Despite their common classification, these two models boast distinct qualities and have different performance results in several tests.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP received a rating of 68% on our platform. Among its strong points is its good exterior noise performance and reduced rolling resistance. According to Autobild's tests, this particular tyre model shows good kilometer mileage and a low noise level when rolling. Nevertheless, the tests also reveal that this model may perform averagely in the rain with a moderate grip and side guiding ability, alongside low aquaplaning reserves.
On the other hand, the Fulda SportControl 2 scored an impressive 84%, marking a significant jump from the rating of the Kleber tyre. The Fulda tyre was lauded for its comfort, reduced rolling resistance, and exterior noise levels. In terms of aquaplaning, this tyre outperformed the Kleber model with a cross ranking. Autobild praised the Fulda SportControl 2 for its balanced, safe handling in wet conditions and its budget-friendly price. However, some of its drawbacks include slightly delayed steering response and extended wet-braking distances.
In mutual tests, the Fulda SportControl 2 generally had a better position - ranking 12 out of 53 in the Autobild test, while the Kleber Dynaxer UHP came in 15th place.
In conclusion, while Kleber’s Dynaxer UHP is a solid tyre option with decent mileage and noise performance, it may not be the best choice for heavy rain conditions. Contrastingly, Fulda's SportControl 2 is an economical and balanced tyre that excels under wet conditions, making it a strong contender in the summer tyre category. However, note that neither tyre model has been replaced by a newer model according to our data.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | |||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | |||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
