Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let’s delve into a direct comparison between two popular summer tyres - the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2. These tyres have been tested and reviewed extensively with the Kleber performing at 68% of our rating while the Dunlop surpasses it slightly at 79% in the same tests.
Starting with Kleber's Dynaxer UHP, a contender with no predecessor or successor models, stood 15 out of 53 in Autobild's test. Its strongest features were its exterior noise and reasonable fuel efficiency brought by the low rolling resistance. However, test results showed some scope for improvement in terms of wet grip, lateral control in wet conditions, and aquaplaning resistance.
On the flip side, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2, an ultra-high performance sub-type tyre, secured the 11th position in the same Autobild's test. It excelled particularly for its safe driving characteristics on wet roads, good aquaplaning qualities, and short dry braking distances. It did show some weaknesses in terms of delayed steering response on dry roads.
In terms of individual strengths, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP stands out for its good mileage and quiet rolling noise - a direct result of the tyre’s low rolling resistance. However, it shows some shortfalls on wet roads with moderate grip and limited hydroplaning reserves.
The Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 shines in terms of its safe driving properties on wet surfaces, proving a reliable choice for summer conditions with occasional rains. The tyre's quality in dealing with aquaplaning and its short dry braking distances further add to its advantages. Some delay in steering response on dry tarmac was observed but does not significantly impact overall performance.
Considering all test data, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 takes the lead overall, showcasing superior strengths and fewer weaknesses than the Kleber Dynaxer UHP. However, the latter may appeal to drivers particularly concerned with tyre noise and fuel efficiency.
In conclusion, both tyres are solid choices for summer conditions. Your preference between the two will depend on your driving conditions and priorities, whether that be noise level, fuel efficiency, or hydroplaning resistance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 61.8 | 27 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,3 | 33 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 35,4 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
