• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

# Kleber Dynaxer HP4
/76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/68%

Add to comparison

Kleber
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

When weighing the benefits between the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the BFGoodrich Advantage, it's clear these summer tyres offer unique strengths and corresponding weaknesses.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4, by Kleber, scored slightly higher in our internal rating system at 82%. In the Autobild test, the tyre positioned 14th out of 53 tested tyres. While the top features of this model are comfort and exterior noise, it performs poorly in wet conditions as stated by Autobild 2024. Furthermore, this tyres is weaker when it comes to grip on wet surfaces and its response to steering on a dry track can be noticeably delayed.


The BFGoodrich Advantage, by BFGoodrich is another summer tyre option. With a rating of 76%, it came in 18th place in the Autobild test. The strength of this tyre appears to be in the comfort and dry handling, even offering dynamic dry handling and a reduced rolling resistance. However, BFGoodrich Advantage tends to understeer in wet conditions and has a comparatively longer braking distance when exposed to moisture.


In the ADAC test of 50 tyres, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 12th position, once again outperforming the BFGoodrich Advantage which came in at the 21st position.


Neither tyres have been replaced with a newer model. Given their performances in our tests and various others, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to be the overall better performing tyre, yet the BFGoodrich Advantage certainly has its advantages and can be a cost-effective option given its reduced rolling resistance and lower price. However, for drivers regularly exposed to wet driving conditions, both tyres may not provide the best solution for handling and safety.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Rating
Best values in testpříkladné
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Good
dobré
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
dobré
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP437,428,8
BFGoodrich Advantage37,429,1
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingEnviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in testdobré1,31,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Good
chvalitebné2,12,8
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
chvalitebné2,82,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné12+1+
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-23+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
dobré2-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné1-2+1
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-22-
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Kleber Dynaxer HP436,231,6
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Show test details