Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP3
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison between the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005 brings forth some interesting findings. Both tyres are designed for summer use, with the Turanza T005 also falling under the touring sub-type category. The 'Made in' details for the Bridgestone Turanza T005 include HU, PL, FR, and IT.
Regarding our rating, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 picked up a score of only 41%, while the superior Bridgestone Turanza T005 achieved a solid 89%. The Dynaxer HP3, produced by Kleber, did not have any previous models nor was it replaced by any new model. Similarly, the Turanza T005 made by Bridgestone has not been replaced by a newer model yet, and does not have any preceding models to compare.
Moving on to test results, the ADAC tests saw the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 on 11th position out of 12 tyres tested. Its best-performed areas were Wet circle cornering. However, its overall test performance was weak, resulting in a low ranking. This tyre tends to have a lower price bracket, hence, can be considered if budget is a constraint and the car drive is mostly aimed at city limits.
On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 secured a close to top position in both the ADAC and Autobild tests, showcasing strong performances in Dry braking, Interior noise, and Wet handling. Its superior construction ensures excellent road handling, lower noise, and strong braking capabilities under dry conditions, which is an essential requirement for summer tyres.
In Autobild tests, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ranked 18th out of 51 tyres, whereas the Bridgestone Turanza T005 stood at 2nd position. Interestingly, both tyres performed well in Wet conditions; however, Turanza T005 seems to have an upper hand when it comes to overall performance criteria.
In conclusion, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 significantly outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 in most aspects, making it the more superior choice of the two. While it might come at a slightly higher price, the quality, performance, and the safety features certainly justify the cost.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,4 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 39,2 | 37,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
