Segment
1. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost2. Norauto Prevensys 4 Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 vs. Norauto Prevensys 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Norauto). Generally, Kenda summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Norauto (49%). In this particular case, the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 has a better rating of 58% compared to 45% of the Norauto Prevensys 4. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the Prevensys 4 were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
| Norauto Prevensys 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Norauto Prevensys 4 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 3,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
