Segment
1. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (37%) than Imperial (7%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 were tested.
| # | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 | 37,3 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
