Segment
1. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. Debica Frigo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101,1 | 103,4 | 102,8 | 100 | |||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 92,1 | 86,9 | 99,2 | 90,2 | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 95,66 | 91,8 | 95,8 | 99,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
