Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Imperial EcoSport SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial EcoSport SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Imperial (17%). The first tyre test of Imperial EcoSport SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the EcoSport SUV and the Azenis FK510 SUV were tested.
| # | Imperial EcoSport SUV
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Imperial EcoSport SUV Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 3- | 2- | 2- | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
