Segment
1. Imperial EcoDriver 5 Lowcost2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial EcoDriver 5 vs. Debica Presto HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Imperial (17%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto HP2 has a better rating of 79% compared to 17% of the Imperial EcoDriver 5. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the EcoDriver 5 and the Presto HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial EcoDriver 5
| Debica Presto HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Imperial EcoDriver 5 | 40,1 | 32,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Imperial Ecodriver 5 | 37,3 | 36,1 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||