Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Firestone (65%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
Show test details |