Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 vs. Barum Polaris 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Barum (61%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the Polaris 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Barum Polaris 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442
| Barum Polaris 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
