Segment
2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Barum Polaris 5
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Barum (63%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Barum Polaris 5 also have C wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary and Polaris 5 is made in Czech Republic.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
