Segment
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Matador (33%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
