Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 75% of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3. The first tyre test of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 392 | vítěz testu | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Recommended | 369 | doporučeno | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | 392 | vítěz testu | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2 | 2.1 | ||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2.8 | 2.2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | dobré | 3.1 | 2.1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 2,0 | ||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,7 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 3,2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 98.9 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 99.7 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||