14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 78% of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3. The first tyre test of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

#	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /78%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 77

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 12x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 3.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.92

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

Year of the last test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2024

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

Best rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Wet braking

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 66%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 62%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 96%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

Wet handling

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 69%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

80%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 76%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78%

Snow handling

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

Snow cornering

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

72%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 70%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Rolling resistance

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Price/value

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 55%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Dry braking

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 71%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

Dry handling

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Hankook W462 Winter icept RS3 Rating: Good*	2	2	2	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3	37.8	29.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Hankook W462 Winter icept RS3 Rating: Good*	2.8	2.2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3	35,3	26,6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Hankook W462 Winter icept RS3 Rating: Good*	2+	2	2	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands