Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Nokian zLine
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 81% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is made - Korea.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Nokian zLine | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
2. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian zLine ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%