Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we compare two summer tyres: the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Nokian Powerproof. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is a UUHP tyre made in South Korea while the Nokian Powerproof is a summer tyre made in Finland. Both tyres have been widely used as first equipment on various car models such as Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127:
This tyre has an overall rating of 87% and is known for its relatively good performance in various tests. In the AutoMotorSport test, it ranks 3rd out of 10 tyres, with the best features being dry lane changing, wet braking, and wet handling. However, it has some weaknesses, such as aquaplaning resistance, reduced dry cornering grip, and sluggish steering response. In the Automotorsport 2022 test, it was praised for very short braking on wet asphalt and largely safe, predictable behavior in wet corners. Unfortunately, it suffers from noticeable scuffing noise.
Nokian Powerproof:
This tyre has an overall rating of 85% and also performs fairly well in several tests. In the AutoMotorSport test, it ranks 6th out of 10 tyres, with its best feature being dry steering response. In the Automotorsport 2022 test, it was praised for neutral and predictable but still agile and controllable handling on wet surfaces, and precise and easy-to-control performance in dry corners. However, it has a weakness in aquaplaning safety and exhibits low level of rolling and scuffing noise.
Comparing their positions in mutual tests can give us a better understanding of their overall performance. In the Autozeitung test, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ranks 9th and the Nokian Powerproof ranks 6th out of 10 tyres. In the Autobild test (with 50 tires), the Hankook ranks 10th while the Nokian ranks 2nd, excelling in wet braking. In the ADAC test, the Hankook ranks 14th, and the Nokian ranks 11th out of 16 tyres, being praised for its noise and interior noise performance.
Verdict:
Overall, both the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Nokian Powerproof have their strengths and weaknesses. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 performs better in dry lane changing, wet braking, and wet handling, but struggles with aquaplaning resistance and cornering grip. On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof excels in dry steering response and wet handling, but has a weakness in aquaplaning safety. Based on their positions in mutual tests, the Nokian Powerproof seems to have a better overall performance than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. However, the choice between the two largely depends on the drivers' preferences and priorities. For more information on each tyre, visit Hankook and Nokian manufacturer pages.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vynikající | 9,0 | 9,7 | 9,4 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Very good | velmi dobré | 8,5 | 8,0 | 6,3 | |||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | dobré | 7,6 | 8,0 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 78 | 69 | 87 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 85 | 83 | 87 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 | |
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||