Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 74% compared to 21% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is made in Korea and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
