Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 75% compared to 55% of the Continental PremiumContact 5. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Continental PremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2019 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the PremiumContact 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Continental PremiumContact 5 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus Prime3 K125 is made in Hungary and PremiumContact 5 is made in Czech Republic.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Continental PremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
1. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,8 | doporučeno | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | doporučeno | 7,8 | 9,3 | 6,9 | ||
Continental PremiumContact 5 Rating: Recommended | 8,1 | doporučeno | 9,1 | 7,2 | 6,6 | ||
Show test details |