Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than GT (37%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 66% compared to 61% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
Show test details |