Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
| # | Gt Radial Fe2
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
For both the Gt Radial Fe2 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52, drivers report distinct strengths and weaknesses. While the Gt Radial Fe2 lacks a predecessor model, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is an upgraded version of the widely recognized Kumho Ecsta HS51.
The Gt Radial Fe2 counts amongst the ultra-high performance tyre class. Its performance is reflected in a secure aquaplaning rating and short dry braking times. However, tests have shown lower than ideal grip on both wet and dry surfaces, alongside an extended wet braking distance and average aquaplaning resistance. Generally, the GT Radial Fe2 tyre is praised for its good wet and dry handling with a nice subjective balance and its low rolling resistance.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a summer tyre classed within the touring category. Notably, in the Autobild test, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 tyre achieved the highly acclaimed second place amongst 55 tyres tested, with its strengths registered in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking. Whilst, it garnered praises for convincing driving performance on both wet and dry surfaces with short wet and dry braking times, this tyre has been described to feature moderate comfort when rolling.
In comparative testing, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 often outperformed the Gt Radial Fe2. For instance, in the Autobild test the Kumho HS52 placed 2nd, while the Gt Radial Fe2 ranked considerably lower, in 19th place. Similarly, in the ADAC test, the Kumho was closer to the top in 8th place, while the Gt Radial finished at 22nd place.
In conclusion, when comparing both tyres, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 tends to be viewed as the superior tyre with its stronger ranking in test evaluations and overall driving performance. However, the Gt Radial Fe2 remains a viable choice, particularly when it comes to safe aquaplaning and short dry braking.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Gt Radial Fe2 68%
Wet braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 | 37,4 | 29,3 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| GT Radial FE2 | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,0 | 2,9 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
