Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than GT (37%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 49% of the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested.
# | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |