Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Goodyear (85%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo has C rating.
# | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | |||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: Recommended | 9,7 | 8,0 | 9,0 | 8,0 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: Still recommended | 5,7 | 7,9 | 9,5 | 7,9 | |||
Show test details |