10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 88% of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.

#	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /88%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /92%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 177

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 22x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.32

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2023

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
85%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
76%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 83%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 73%

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
84%

Snow braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
71%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 65%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

Ice

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
84.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2.4	2.3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,1	2,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	1,4	2,2	2,0	2,8	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2	2-	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 235/55 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	1-	2	1	1	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2+	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	2+	1-	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	2,2	2,5	3,0	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

TÜV Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance
Best values in test	1102	301,21	501,21	202,4	109,6
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	1083	299,7	493,1	195	95,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	1097	300,69	497,39	196,8	102,4
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	98,1	298,5	282,5	93,7	87,5	99,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Recommended	193	66	44	53	18	7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	7,6	7,8	8,4	8	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	34,4	24,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 235/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,5	1,9	1,8	2,3	2,6	0,8	1,8
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,9	1,5	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,5	3,0	2,2	2,4	3,0	2,0	1,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Automotorsport Winter tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	8,9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Very good	8,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	30,6	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Winter tyre test 2021 225/40 R18

Name
Best values in test	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	1
Show test details

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands