Segment
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Debica (57%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear UltraGrip 9 and Debica Frigo 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip 9 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the UltraGrip 9 and the Frigo 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Goodyear UltraGrip 9 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (74%) of the Debica Frigo 2 also have C wet ratings. We also know where UltraGrip 9 is made - Slovenia.
# | Goodyear UltraGrip 9
| Debica Frigo 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 68 dB
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |